Build and price is the most frequently used tool among in-market shoppers on OEM websites (85%) in the US..
Two primary reasons drive shoppers’ use of the build and price tool: to determine whether a vehicle fits in their budget (35%) and to build an ideal vehicle with every feature and accessory they desire (29%).
According to the J.D. Power 2015 ‘manufacturer website evaluation’ study: “When used by shoppers, the build and price tool can significantly improve satisfaction and increase the likelihood that they will visit a dealership to test drive.”
The semi-annual study, now in its 16th year, measures the usefulness of automotive manufacturer websites during the new-vehicle shopping process, which is measured on a 1000-point scale, by examining four key measures (in order of importance):
- Information/content
- Appearance
- Navigation
- Speed
The build and price tool is used for more than just building the desired vehicle. Shoppers use it most often to find a vehicle in their shopping area (59%); research vehicle information (50%); and research price-related information (49%) when evaluating manufacturer websites.
“There is fierce competition in the automotive industry and a manufacturer’s website is a key channel for OEMs to show in-market shoppers why they should purchase their vehicles,” says Arianne Walker, senior director, automotive media and marketing solutions at J.D. Power.
“In fact, the build and price tool is a key differentiator in the online shopping experience for consumers, creating a more satisfying, useful experience when it is well designed. It is critical to help shoppers understand the value of a vehicle as well as the benefits of vehicle trims and accessories, and to help them identify where they can find the vehicle of interest to test drive.”
Key findings
Among new-vehicle shoppers who are “delighted” with their experience on an OEM’s website (overall satisfaction scores of 901 or higher), 64% indicate they are more likely to test drive a vehicle after visiting the manufacturer’s site, compared with only 20% of those who are “disappointed” (satisfaction scores of 500 or below).
Premium brand shoppers (33%) are more likely to use the build and price tool to build their ideal vehicle vs. non-premium shoppers (26%). Non-premium shoppers are more likely to use the tool for budget reasons (38%) than are premium shoppers (29%).
Satisfaction is significantly higher among shoppers who use the build and price tool than among those who do not (801 vs. 770, respectively).
Study rankings
Jeep (816) ranks highest overall, followed by Infiniti and Jaguar in a tie (815 each) and Cadillac and Porsche in a tie (814 each). Overall satisfaction with automotive brand websites averages 795.
The 2015 Manufacturer Website Evaluation Study is based on responses from more than 9800 new-vehicle shoppers who indicate they will be in the market for a new vehicle within the next 24 months.
Manufacturer website index scores
(based on a 1000-point scale):
- Jeep 816
- Infiniti 815
- Jaguar 815
- Cadillac 814
- Porsche 814
- Mercedes-Benz 813
- smart 812
- MINI 811
- Acura 808
- Honda 807
- Land Rover 802
- Buick 801
- Hyundai 799
- Lincoln 799
- BMW 797
- Fiat 796
- Ford 796
- GMC 795
- Industry Average 795
- Lexus 794
- Audi 793
- Chevrolet 793
- Scion 792
- Nissan 791
- Mazda 789
- Toyota 787
- Kia 785
- Mitsubishi 785
- Subaru 780
- Ram 778
- Volkswagen 774
- Chrysler 770
- Dodge 767
- Volvo 756
